Evidence-based medicine for the new millennium: Critical appraisal and pragmatic approach.
نویسندگان
چکیده
It is not news that medicine and other health care areas are changing. In recent years, physicians have been confronted with the challenge of the exponential increase in medical knowledge, as approximately two million articles are published annually in close to 23,000 biomedical journals. It is estimated that a general physician has to read 19 articles a day for 365 days each year to keep abreast with his field. 1 The challenge is compounded further by the fact that much of the published knowledge is of controversial value. That paradox set the way for the foundation of the recent concepts of evidence-based medicine (EBM). This has been defined by David L. Sackett, a founder of the EBM movement, as " the judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. " 2 In a recently published article in the Annals of Saudi Medicine, Stewart elegantly introduced the readers to the new approach. 3 This editorial is intended to provide practical guidance for practicing physicians, physicians primarily involved in academic medicine, and also for health care policymakers in how to apply EBM. Searching for evidence traditionally takes the following steps: 1) precisely formulating the question; 2) designing a search strategy; 3) identifying search resources; 4) critically appraising search results; 5) refining the search if dictated; and 6) applying the findings and making a decision about an individual patient or a medical controversy. Computerized databases are the main search resources. MEDLINE, perhaps the most frequently used medical database, contains approximately seven million citations and abstracts from only 4000 journals. 4 This multipurpose database is produced by the US National Library of Medicine. There are also several databases that are MEDLINE-dependent, e.g., Cancerlit, PDQ (oncology-related databases), and EMBASE, which host, in addition to MEDLINE database, many of the pharmaceutical trials. Recently, MEDLINE access became available free of charge for anyone who has access to the Internet through Internet Grateful MED PubMed, though a MEDLINE-dependent database, has unique and indispensable features. PubMed allows searchers to find articles by specifying publication type and also determining the sensitivity and specificity of the search. PubMed also has an advanced search option operated by a powerful search engine developed by McMaster University to permit filtering the literature to optimize retrieval of clinically applicable studies. Other databases are particularly designed to serve EBM. Through a joint effort between the American College of Physicians …
منابع مشابه
Some Notes on Critical Appraisal of Prevalence Studies; Comment on: “The Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews Addressing Questions of Prevalence”
Decisions in healthcare should be based on information obtained according to the principles of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM). An increasing number of systematic reviews are published which summarize the results of prevalence studies. Interpretation of the results of these reviews should be accompanied by an appraisal of the methodological quality of the included data and studies. The critical a...
متن کاملThe Effect of Introducing Evidence Based Medicine on Critical Appraisal Skills of Medical Students
Introduction: Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) is a set of methods and resources for finding and employing the best evidences among present resources in order to manage each patient. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of an introductory course of EBM on critical appraisal skills of medical students. Methods: This Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT) was performed on clerkship students in ...
متن کاملA review on evidence-based medicine
Physicians’ daily need for valid information about diseases, their limited time for finding this information, the inadequacy of traditional sources (E.g. textbooks) to address this matter, the disparity between physicians diagnostic skills and clinical judgment (Which increase with experience) and their up to date knowledge and clinical performance (Which decline by time), as well as dramatic d...
متن کاملEvidence based medicine in nuclear medicine practice; Part II: Appraising and applying the evidence
As described in the first part of this article, Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) is a growing part of medical practice which emphasizes on the best evidence. Finding this evidence by formulating an answerable question and searching strategies were described in the first part of this review. In this part, appraising the retrieved article (with the main focus on the diag...
متن کاملCritical Appraisal of the Validity and Reliability of the Quantitative Studies Published in Iranian Nursing Journals
Background: Despite progression of knowledge of nursing researcher about importance of psychometric principles of instruments of studies but it seems that this subject is not used correctly in nursing studies. This study is designed to critically assess the validity and reliability of instruments applied in studies published in Iranian nursing journals Methods: This study is a critical review o...
متن کاملEffect of evidence based medicine training in the quality of journal clubs: A road to evidence based journal clubs
Introduction: Journal clubs play an important role in teaching Evidence Based Medicine (EBM). Evidence based journal clubs focus on real problems of the group, and set a minimum level of evidence for articles to be presented, and in the end a clinical bottom line is set to be used in the daily clinical practice. In this article, we have explained our experience in r...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Annals of Saudi medicine
دوره 19 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1999